Itemupdating beforeproperties null childless women dating fathers
Now with some help, I realize that mainly the code just has to be written a certain way - but it’s also true to say that there is a limitation which can affect some things you might want to do.
In any case, this is a gotcha that I’m starting to see other people hit so I think it’s worth talking about it.
When accessing a user field in event receivers there are few differences in the returned values when Classic mode authentication is used from the value when Claims based authentication is used.
The difference is present in After Properties of Item Adding and Item Updating event.
The event receiver was nicely attached and got busy when I uploaded a document. I was trying to change permissions on an item and this was the part of my code that was creating the problems: Inside my SPRemote Event Type.
Item Updated I did an Update and making it trigger itself. If you’re dealing with a event receiver with access to server side code, this is not a problem.
I should also point out that I know the difference between a metaphor and simile in case that was bothering you from the opening sentence.
Perhaps you need to create, update or delete an item somewhere, or perform some other action related to sites, users or data in Share Point. Before we dig into the “Why it happens” and “The workaround” sections, it’s worth reminding ourselves of some aspects of remote code and authentication in particular.Developing a Sharepoint application would have all the fun of a video game, if only you had infinite lives.Dangers lurk hidden out there which, if you run into them, can be a blow to your project and waste a great deal of time.With that in mind, Share Point 2010 is like a sea of icebergs – there is a lot going on under the surface that you may not notice until it’s too late.Unfortunately, that makes your project like the Titanic.
Damon gives just one example of a poisoned dagger in the game of Sharepoint Development: The Item Event Receiver.